Boards and CEOs are pouring billions into leadership development, yet many still complain that their leaders are not ready for the future. Against that backdrop, the question is shifting from “Should we develop leaders?” to “Where does our next dollar go—a leadership training program or executive coaching?”
The answer is not either–or. Both can deliver strong returns, but in very different ways and on different time horizons. The leaders and HR teams that get this right build a deliberate portfolio: scalable programs where it makes sense, and sharp, personalised coaching where behaviour change at the top really moves the needle.
The ROI question behind leadership spend
Global spending on leadership development continues to grow, with estimates putting the broader leadership training and development market in the tens of billions of dollars annually. LinkedIn’s latest Workplace Learning Report shows leadership and management skills at the top of L&D priorities worldwide, yet a small minority of organisations describe their leaders as “very effective.”
Studies summarised by HiBob and others suggest that well-designed leadership training can generate a few units of value for every unit invested, with some analyses putting average returns in the region of four dollars back for every dollar spent. At the same time, surveys of leadership experts have reported even higher average returns—up to around seven-to-one in some aggregated leadership development portfolios—when programmes are tightly linked to business outcomes and carefully measured.
Executive coaching numbers are equally striking. A long-cited MetrixGlobal study, referenced by American University’s overview of the ROI of executive coaching, reported returns approaching eight times the original investment when productivity and retention gains were included. The International Coaching Federation highlights global surveys where organisations report average returns of roughly seven times the cost of coaching engagements.
What a leadership training program really delivers
A leadership training program is typically designed to develop a cohort of leaders around a shared set of skills and frameworks. This might include communication, coaching, feedback, decision-making, inclusive leadership, leading change and other core capabilities needed across the leadership population.
When done well, the benefits are clear:
-
Scale and consistency. Training can reach dozens or hundreds of managers at once, giving them a common language and toolkit for performance conversations, goal-setting and day-to-day leadership.
-
Foundations for new leaders. Studies on first-time manager programmes show significant improvements in performance, retention and engagement, with some research citing triple-digit annualised ROI when these programmes are properly structured and aligned to role expectations.
However, generic or poorly executed training often disappoints. McKinsey’s analysis of why leadership-development programs fail argues that many initiatives lack a clear link to strategy, ignore context, and are treated as one-off events rather than journeys, which drastically reduces impact. SHRM’s guidance on measuring leadership development ROI adds that most organisations still measure attendance and satisfaction rather than hard behavioural or business outcomes, making it easy to overestimate results.
In short: a leadership training program is a powerful way to raise the baseline and build a pipeline—but it is rarely enough, on its own, to shift the entrenched behaviours of senior decision-makers.
What executive coaching really delivers
Executive coaching, by contrast, is designed around one person at a time. It provides a confidential space where a senior leader can confront blind spots, test decisions and hard-wire new behaviours with the help of an experienced coach. Research consistently finds that executive coaching has a particularly strong effect on behavioural outcomes—the way leaders act in real situations—rather than just on attitudes or knowledge.
A recent meta-analysis in Frontiers in Psychology found a moderate overall effect size for coaching across outcomes, with especially strong gains in behavioural change, self-efficacy, resilience and psychological resources. Reviews such as Edgecumbe’s summary of executive coaching effectiveness emphasise improvements in goal attainment, leadership behaviours, well-being and performance, all of which are difficult to achieve through short-form training alone.
On the ROI side:
-
The MetrixGlobal study referenced above reported a near 788% return when both productivity and retention gains were added to the calculation.
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers surveys for the International Coaching Federation report an average organisational ROI of around seven times the cost of coaching engagements, with many respondents citing even higher returns.
-
Other analyses, summarised by firms such as LeggUp, echo this pattern—coaching investments pay off not just in financial performance, but also in reduced turnover, stronger cultures and more effective leadership pipelines.
Coaching outcomes are harder to capture in a traditional training ROI spreadsheet—much of the value sits in better decisions, fewer derailments, faster transitions and healthier senior teams—but the pattern across studies is clear: when behaviour at the top changes, the system often changes with it.
Leadership training program vs executive coaching: a practical comparison
For directors, VPs and HR leaders deciding where to invest, it helps to look at the two options side-by-side.
| Dimension | Leadership training program | Executive coaching |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Build core skills and common language across a group (e.g., first-line managers, high potentials). | Change the behaviour and thinking of an individual leader, often at senior level. |
| Scale | High: can reach many leaders at once, often across geographies. | Low: typically one leader per coach (or very small groups). |
| Depth of change | Moderate: good for awareness, foundational skills and mindset shifts when reinforced. | High: strong evidence for sustained behavioural change and psychological growth. |
| Typical ROI profile | Research suggests averages in the 3–4x range for well-designed programmes, with some analyses reporting up to 7x in strong cases. | Global surveys and case studies often cite average returns around 7x or more, with some studies reporting even higher percentages. |
| Best use cases | Onboarding new managers, building a bench of future leaders, driving culture shifts at scale. | Supporting executives through major transitions, addressing derailment risks, accelerating high-stakes behaviour change. |
| Measurement challenges | Easier to track reach, completion and immediate feedback; harder to tie directly to long-term business outcomes unless carefully designed. | Behaviour and perception changes can be measured, but isolating financial impact requires thoughtful design and is often qualitative. |
The conclusion many experts now draw is not that one is “better” than the other, but that they serve different purposes. A strong leadership training program pulls the whole pipeline upward; executive coaching sharpens the tip of the spear.
Building an ROI‑positive leadership portfolio
For organisations in fast-moving markets such as the UAE and GCC, the question is how to combine leadership training programs and executive coaching into a coherent development strategy rather than treating them as separate purchases. A few principles help.
-
Align everything to strategy and roles
Start with the strategic agenda: digital transformation, regional expansion, regulatory complexity, ESG commitments, cost pressure, or all of the above. Then define the capabilities needed at each leadership tier and design your leadership training program and coaching investments to build those capabilities explicitly. -
Use training to raise the floor
Deploy leadership training programs to equip large cohorts—especially first-line and mid-level managers—with core skills in coaching, feedback, performance, inclusion and change leadership. Data from leadership statistics reports suggests that even basic manager training can significantly reduce turnover and improve engagement when it is properly targeted and supported. -
Use coaching to raise the ceiling
Reserve executive coaching for roles where behaviour change carries outsized impact: business-unit heads, CFOs, regional leaders, successors to C‑suite roles, and high-potential directors on the cusp of major promotions. Evidence and practice suggest that coaching is particularly valuable during transitions—promotion into a bigger role, entering a new market, leading a major transformation—when derailment risk is highest. -
Blend the two for key populations
Some of the most effective designs now combine both: for example, a nine‑month leadership programme with workshops, peer learning and live projects, plus individual coaching for each participant. This model turns theory into habit, because leaders are challenged on how they are applying the content in their real context, not just what they remember from the slide deck. -
Measure what matters, not just what is easy
Following SHRM’s guidance, anchor evaluation in a mix of leading and lagging indicators: behaviour changes observed by managers and peers, improvements in engagement and retention, promotion readiness, and eventually hard metrics such as productivity, safety, sales or cost reduction. For coaching, draw on simple behavioural scorecards and stakeholder feedback tools advocated in research on coaching evaluation, rather than relying only on self-report.
Where Binod fits into your ROI equation
For many organisations, the challenge is not just running a leadership training program or commissioning coaching – it is making sense of the whole portfolio and getting senior leaders to take development seriously. That is where an external voice with real executive scars and finance credibility can pay for itself.
Binod is an ex–Finance Director, Chartered Accountant and CFA charterholder who built and sold a successful training business before focusing on executive coaching, leadership development and keynote speaking for ambitious professionals. Having led teams, navigated corporate politics and operated as an entrepreneur, he understands both the promise and the limitations of off‑the‑shelf leadership training, and he designs his work to drive practical, trackable shifts in behaviour rather than feel‑good events.
-
Senior teams, CHROs and business heads who want to rethink their leadership investments can bring Binod in through his Keynote Speaking offer at https://binodshankar.com/keynote-speaking/, where he speaks candidly about why so much leadership training underdelivers and how to combine programmes and coaching for real ROI.
-
Organisations or individual executives who want to explore a more personalised route—particularly finance leaders and senior managers in the UAE, GCC and beyond—can start a direct conversation via the Connect page at https://binodshankar.com/connect/, where coaching and tailored leadership journeys are designed around real business stakes, not generic checklists.
In a world where leadership budgets are under pressure and expectations of impact are rising, the sharpest question is no longer, “Should we train our leaders?” It is, “Are we using the right mix of leadership training programs and executive coaching to change the behaviour that truly drives results?”